Jule Niemeier vs Tamara Zidansek Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W L L L L W L W L
Form
L W W L W L W L W LHead To Head: Niemeier 1 - 2 Zidansek
They have played 6 sets in total, with Niemeier winning 2 and Zidansek winning 4. The last match between Niemeier and Zidansek was at the San Luis Potosi Open - San Luis Potosi, 25-03-2024, First, Clay with Tamara Zidansek getting the victory 6-4 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Jule Niemeier | 1 |
| Tamara Zidansek | 2 |
San Luis Potosi Open - San Luis Potosi(25-03-2024)
6
4
6
3
| Niemeier | Stats | Zidansek |
|---|---|---|
| 35% (6-11) | YTD Win/Loss | 57% (12-9) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 2 |
| 109 | Ranking | 155 |
| 61 | Highest Rank | 22 |
| 25 | Age | 27 |
| - | Plays | R |
| 5 | Titles | 21 |
| 58% (214-157) | Career Total W/L | 64% (361-206) |
| $1,659,625 | Career Prize Money | $1,990,811 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 2 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Bencic VS Gauff PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
28 Apr 2025 / Fourth
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Fritz VS Bonzi PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
27 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-3 |
Stats 
Tamara Zidansek
Player
Jule Niemeier
62%
(
42 of
68)
1st Serve %
61%
(
43 of
70)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
62%
(
26 of
42)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
41%
(
28 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
70)
74
Total Points Won
64
|
||||
| 6-3 7-6(11) |
Stats
Tamara Zidansek
Player
Jule Niemeier
51%
(
49 of
96)
1st Serve %
59%
(
48 of
82)
1
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
10
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
31 of
48)
60%
(
28 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
39%
(
37 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
36 of
82)
95
Total Points Won
83
|
||||
| 6-2 6-4 |
Stats
Jule Niemeier
Player
Tamara Zidansek
58%
(
35 of
60)
1st Serve %
72%
(
38 of
53)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
33%
(
20 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
65
Total Points Won
48
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 2 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 4 |
| 28 | Games Won | 31 |
| 8 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 19 | Total Double Faults | 10 |
| 1:46:39 | Average Match Time | 1:46:39 |
| 59% (126/212) | 1st Serve % | 59% (129/217) |
| 63% (80/126) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (80/129) |
| 49% (42/86) | 2nd Serve Win % | 53% (47/88) |
| 28% (8/29) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (9/18) |
| 41% (90/217) | Return Points Win % | 42% (90/212) |
| 33% (1/3) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 67% (2/3) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (2/2) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (2/0) |
| 0% (2/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Jule Niemeier Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Panna Udvardy
Player
Jule Niemeier
58%
(
32 of
55)
1st Serve %
53%
(
29 of
55)
3
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
6
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
31%
(
17 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
28 of
55)
66
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jule Niemeier
Player
Anastasia Zakharova
59%
(
40 of
68)
1st Serve %
58%
(
38 of
66)
0
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
2
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
43%
(
29 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
34 of
66)
73
Total Points Won
61
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jasmine Paolini
Player
Jule Niemeier
70%
(
44 of
63)
1st Serve %
44%
(
24 of
54)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
68%
(
30 of
44)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
40%
(
25 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
65
Total Points Won
52
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jule Niemeier
Player
Laura Siegemund
50%
(
59 of
119)
1st Serve %
75%
(
68 of
91)
5
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
4
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
45 of
68)
58%
(
35 of
60)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
39%
(
47 of
119)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
33 of
91)
105
Total Points Won
105
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 1 |
Stats
Sonay Kartal
Player
Jule Niemeier
88%
(
46 of
52)
1st Serve %
129%
(
58 of
45)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
6
61%
(
28 of
46)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
38%
(
3 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
43%
(
23 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
31 of
57)
65
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 1 |
Stats
Eva Vedder
Player
Jule Niemeier
102%
(
61 of
60)
1st Serve %
66%
(
39 of
59)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
6
61%
(
17 of
28)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
40%
(
20 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
34 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Greetje Minnen
Player
Jule Niemeier
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve %
53%
(
31 of
58)
4
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
10
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
17 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
30 of
58)
65
Total Points Won
45
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Robin Montgomery
Player
Jule Niemeier
54%
(
43 of
79)
1st Serve %
52%
(
55 of
105)
3
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
8
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
36 of
55)
44%
(
16 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
19 of
50)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
42%
(
33 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
50 of
105)
96
Total Points Won
88
|
3-6 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jule Niemeier
Player
Eva Lys
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve %
58%
(
38 of
65)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
64%
(
21 of
33)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
45%
(
23 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
38 of
65)
66
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jule Niemeier
Player
Hanne Vandewinkel
54%
(
43 of
79)
1st Serve %
64%
(
36 of
56)
3
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
6
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
39%
(
14 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
42%
(
33 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
75
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Tamara Zidansek Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Francisca Jorge
Player
Tamara Zidansek
70%
(
45 of
64)
1st Serve %
74%
(
52 of
70)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
60%
(
27 of
45)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
35 of
52)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
41%
(
26 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
27 of
70)
65
Total Points Won
69
|
3-6 6-4 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tamara Zidansek
Player
Amandine Hesse
61%
(
41 of
67)
1st Serve %
49%
(
24 of
49)
1
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
6
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
38%
(
10 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
45%
(
30 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
65
Total Points Won
51
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Katie Volynets
Player
Tamara Zidansek
91%
(
51 of
56)
1st Serve %
58%
(
42 of
72)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
60%
(
3 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
22 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
37 of
72)
71
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tamara Zidansek
Player
Mona Barthel
59%
(
51 of
86)
1st Serve %
44%
(
42 of
95)
0
Aces
6
6
Double Faults
13
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
23 of
53)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
43%
(
37 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
47 of
95)
96
Total Points Won
85
|
7-6(5) 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Lia Karatancheva
Player
Tamara Zidansek
58%
(
52 of
89)
1st Serve %
61%
(
57 of
94)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
56%
(
29 of
52)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
30 of
57)
59%
(
22 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
43%
(
38 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
47 of
94)
98
Total Points Won
85
|
2-6 6-2 7-6(0) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tamara Zidansek
Player
Anastasia Zakharova
53%
(
51 of
96)
1st Serve %
73%
(
64 of
88)
0
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
4
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
31 of
64)
42%
(
19 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
58%
(
7 of
12)
48%
(
46 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
45 of
88)
95
Total Points Won
89
|
2-6 7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Oksana Selekhmeteva
Player
Tamara Zidansek
63%
(
49 of
78)
1st Serve %
58%
(
41 of
71)
1
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
2
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
42%
(
33 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
71)
80
Total Points Won
69
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tamara Zidansek
Player
Dalma Galfi
61%
(
40 of
66)
1st Serve %
59%
(
34 of
58)
0
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
3
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
38%
(
10 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
44%
(
29 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
26 of
58)
63
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tamara Zidansek
Player
Darja Semenistaja
69%
(
45 of
65)
1st Serve %
68%
(
43 of
63)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
37%
(
24 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
29 of
63)
70
Total Points Won
58
|
7-6(2) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tatiana Prozorova
Player
Tamara Zidansek
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve %
59%
(
27 of
46)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
67%
(
22 of
33)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
17 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
57
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 58% (214/157) | Win/Loss | 64% (361/206) |
| 57% (486/360) | Sets Win/Loss | 61% (799/516) |
| 53% (4177/3694) | Games Win/Loss | 54% (6568/5561) |
| 44% (38/49) | Hard Win/Loss | 53% (88/77) |
| 65% (128/69) | Clay Win/Loss | 72% (244/95) |
| 55% (31/25) | Indoor Hard W/L | 49% (21/22) |
| 55% (17/14) | Grass Win/Loss | 40% (8/12) |
| 0.34 | Aces Per Game | 0.08 |
| 1305 | Aces Total | 500 |
| 0.54 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.26 |
| 2067 | Total Double Faults | 1551 |
| 1:38:13 | Average Match Time | 1:26:53 |
| 342.7 | Average Opponent Rank | 408.52 |
| 56% (14083/25082) | 1st Serve % | 66% (23119/35027) |
| 66% (9310/14056) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (13862/23119) |
| 45% (4973/11037) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (5443/11912) |
| 47% (1458/3112) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 49% (2278/4670) |
| 45% (11309/24972) | Return Points Win % | 47% (16469/34719) |
| 62% (24/15) | Slam W/L | 50% (30/30) |
| 33% (8/16) | Masters W/L | 43% (13/17) |
| 29% (2/5) | Cups W/L | 47% (9/10) |
| 50% (46/46) | Main Tour W/L | 53% (67/60) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 63% (122/71) | Challenger W/L | 70% (186/78) |
| 75% (12/4) | Futures W/L | 84% (56/11) |
| 58% (209/361) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 64% (357/555) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 33% (1/3) |
| 53% (38/72) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 64% (77/120) |
| 45% (50/110) | Deciding Set Win % | 58% (109/187) |
| 86% (226/194) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (328/290) |
| 14% (226/32) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (328/35) |
| 14% (145/20) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 30% (239/71) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
